An investigation has uncovered instances where Air Canada cited safety-related maintenance to deny passenger compensation, even when the aircraft originally scheduled for those flights were later used on different routes. This practice potentially exploits a gap in Canadian aviation regulations to avoid paying travelers for disrupted journeys.

How does the maintenance loophole work?

Under Canada's Air Passenger Protection Regulations, travelers can receive up to $1,000 for certain delays or cancellations. However, airlines are not required to pay if the disruption is deemed necessary for safety. This creates what consumer advocates call a maintenance loophole.

Read also Minister questioned over airline safety maintenance loophole

Sylvie De Bellefeuille, a lawyer with the non-profit Option consommateurs, described the exemption as "a huge duffel bag in which they can put anything and everything." Because most travelers lack access to internal flight and maintenance records, it is difficult for them to prove that a cancellation was for commercial rather than safety reasons.

What did the investigation find?

Following a successful challenge by a passenger named Juan Rojas, investigators reviewed four separate cases. The findings included:

  • The airline submitted a maintenance document to the Canadian Transportation Agency for an aircraft that had not been the one meant for Rojas's flight.
  • In three other instances, the airline cited safety maintenance for cancellations, yet records showed the scheduled planes were subsequently used for other routes.

In response to these findings, Air Canada stated that aircraft schedules are fluid and that reassigning functioning planes to different routes is a commercial decision driven by operational needs.

What happens next for travelers?

While the investigation does not prove a widespread pattern of misuse, the cases highlight the difficulty of contesting airline claims. Passengers seeking compensation for cancellations should:

  1. Request specific documentation regarding the maintenance issue.
  2. Compare provided information with actual aircraft movement records if possible.
  3. File formal complaints through the Canadian Transportation Agency.

FAQ

Are airlines required to pay for safety-related delays?

No, Canadian regulations state that compensation is not required if the disruption is necessary for safety reasons.

How much can a passenger claim in Canada?

Depending on the length of the delay or cancellation, passengers may be entitled to up to $1,000.