Attorneys for Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) requested the Justice Department return property seized during a federal search of her Washington, D.C., residence this week. The legal team argued that the investigation into potential immigration fraud was “neither justified nor lawful.”

Allegations of political motivation

In a letter sent to prosecutors, Omar's lawyers accused federal authorities of ignoring judicial restrictions during the search. The defense team characterized the probe into the lawmaker's immigration history as a baseless attempt to target a critic of President Donald Trump.

Lawyers Amy Jeffress and Joshua Matz noted that the search occurred just weeks before the midterm elections. They stated there is no legitimate reason to suggest the congresswoman violated any laws regarding her citizenship status. The legal team described the matter as a “vindictive, retributive, and politically motivated criminal investigation.”

Details of the federal search

While the full scope of the inquiry remains unclear, several key details have emerged regarding the federal search and seizure:

  • Homeland Security officers conducted the search of the residence on Monday, Oct. 12.
  • Federal agents seized Omar’s phone during the operation.
  • More than a dozen grand jury subpoenas have been issued, including to some of Omar's relatives.
  • Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin suggested the probe involves potential crimes related to family immigration paperwork.

What is the Justice Department's response?

Justice Department spokesperson Emily Covington denied the claims made by Omar's legal team. She stated the letter was “riddled with false allegations and inaccuracies.” Covington maintained that law enforcement partners complied with all legal obligations and court orders.

FAQ

What was seized during the search?

Federal authorities seized Rep. Omar's phone during the search of her home.

Why is the timing of the search controversial?

Democrats have criticized the timing because the Justice Department typically avoids public investigative actions involving candidates within 60 days of an election.